On political issues I lean libertarian, but healthcare,
especially for those unable to obtain it in the market, has always been the
chink in my armor. I see healthcare as a
right equal to free speech and private property, and I can’t understand how a
society that protects other basic rights so jealously would let so many in need
suffer with conditions easily treatable for those able to secure
insurance. If the human rights argument
is not strong enough, then perhaps the cost saving to society of avoiding
expensive bad results by providing inexpensive basic care could be enough to
persuade more conservative critics of health care for all.
I spent years sick in desperate attempts to acquire health
insurance that covers mental illness.
Without assistance to afford treatment I never would have
recovered. How many lives are wasted by
a system that discards those too ill to participate in programs beyond their limited
resources to afford or even understand such coverage in a complicated,
expensive system? The answer many states
have found is Medicaid expansion.
I’m sure there are conservative alternatives to Medicaid
expansion that do not place an undue burden on those with serious mental
illness. I just haven’t been able to
find this information, as much as I would like to. I’d like this site to foster a conversation
between competing caring ideas and ideals.
So if you’re aware of workable solutions to take care of the most needy
and most ill-treated among us, please air your case here through the comment
link. Or email me at george@practicingmentalillness.org. I’ll be sure to present every potential
solution in the blog. I especially
invite conservative voices to participate in the discussion.
We’re all unreasonably polarized, and while we all re-trench
into tired, broken positions, people with serious mental illness are being
treated as expendable and less worthy than their more adaptive peers.
No comments:
Post a Comment